Established climate mitigation scenarios assume continued economic growth in all countries, and reconcile this with the Paris targets by betting on speculative technological change. Post-growth approaches may make it easier to achieve rapid mitigation while improving social outcomes, and should be explored by climate modellers.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
59,00 €
only 4,92 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1.
Leimbach, M., Kriegler, E., Roming, N. & Schwanitz, J. Global Environ. Chang. 42, 215–225 (2017).
- 2.
Banerjee, R. et al. Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future: Summary for Policymakers (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
- 3.
Hickel, J. & Kallis, G. New Polit. Econ. 25, 469–486 (2020).
- 4.
Jackson, T. Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (Routledge, 2017).
- 5.
Steinberger, J. K., Lamb, W. F. & Sakai, M. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044016 (2020).
- 6.
Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D. & Oswald, Y. Global Environ. Chang. 65, 102168 (2020).
- 7.
Nieto, J., Carpintero, Ó., Miguel, L. J. & de Blas, I. Energ. Policy 137, 111090 (2020).
- 8.
Anderson, K., Broderick, J. F. & Stoddard, I. Clim. Policy 20, 1290–1304 (2020).
- 9.
Le Quéré, C. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 213–217 (2019).
- 10.
Creutzig, F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 13, 510–515 (2021).
- 11.
Realmonte, G. et al. An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 3277 (2019).
- 12.
De Coninck, H. & Benson, S. M. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 243–270 (2014).
- 13.
Negative emission technologies: what role in meeting Paris agreement targets? EASAC Policy Report 35 (European Academies Science Advisory Council, 2018).
- 14.
Larkin, A., Kuriakose, J., Sharmina, M. & Anderson, K. Clim. Policy 18, 690–714 (2017).
- 15.
van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., van Sluisveld, M. A. E. & Riahi, K. Nat. Energy 2, 902–904 (2017).
- 16.
Grubler, A. et al. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).
- 17.
Brockway, P. E., Sorrell, S. R., Semieniuk, G., Heun, M. K. & Court, V. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 141, 110781 (2021).
- 18.
Haberl, H. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 065003 (2020).
- 19.
Ward, J. D. et al. Plos One 11, e0164733 (2016).
- 20.
Keen, S., Ayres, R. U. & Standish, R. Ecol. Econ. 157, 40–46 (2019).
- 21.
Heun, M. K. & Brockway, P. E. Appl. Energ. 251, 112697 (2019).
- 22.
Fix, B. Biophys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 4, 6 (2019).
- 23.
Lange, S., Pohl, J. & Santarius, T. Ecol. Econ. 176, 106760 (2020).
- 24.
Kallis, G. et al. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43, 291–316 (2018).
- 25.
Kuhnhenn, K., da Costa, L. F. C., Mahnke, E., Schneider, L. & Lange, S. A societal transformation scenario for staying below 1.5 °C (Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, 2020).
- 26.
Steckel, J. C., Brecha, R. J., Jakob, M., Strefler, J. & Luderer, G. Ecol. Econ. 90, 53–67 (2013).
- 27.
Semieniuk, G., Taylor, L., Rezai, A. & Foley, D. K. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 313–318 (2021).
- 28.
Pye, S. et al. Clim. Policy 21, 222–231 (2021).
- 29.
O’Neill, B. C. et al. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 169–180 (2017).
- 30.
D’Alessandro, S., Luzzati, T. & Morroni, M. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 291–298 (2010).
- 31.
D’Alessandro, S., Cieplinski, A., Distefano, T. & Dittmer, K. Nat. Sustain. 3, 329–335 (2020).
- 32.
Haberl, H. et al. Nat. Sustain. 2, 173–184 (2019).
Acknowledgements
G.K. and A.S. acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, through the ‘Maria de Maeztu’ programme for Units of Excellence (CEX2019-000940-M). P.B.’s time was funded by the UK Research and Innovation Council, supported under EPSRC Fellowship award EP/R024254/1.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hickel, J., Brockway, P., Kallis, G. et al. Urgent need for post-growth climate mitigation scenarios. Nat Energy (2021). https://ift.tt/3Aeqmng
-
Published:
"urgent" - Google News
August 04, 2021 at 10:09PM
https://ift.tt/3AeqmUi
Urgent need for post-growth climate mitigation scenarios - Nature.com
"urgent" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2ya063o
https://ift.tt/3d7MC6X
urgent
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Urgent need for post-growth climate mitigation scenarios - Nature.com"
Post a Comment