In what may set a record for speed, the New Jersey COVID-19 Emergency Bond Act (A-4175), passed both houses of the Legislature on July 16, and was signed into law by the governor on the same day. At 4:09 p.m. that afternoon, New Jersey Republican State Committee v. Murphy was filed in the Law Division of Superior Court. (It is unclear whether the original complaint was filed before or after the governor signed. It states that the governor’s signature was expected “imminently,” which was changed to “ostensibly” in an amended complaint lodged the next day after the Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction) The next day (July 17), a sua sponte order from the Supreme Court was entered pursuant to R. 2:12-1, which declared that the matter was now deemed pending in the Supreme Court, ordered expedited briefing, and scheduled oral argument for Aug. 5.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Benefits of a Digital Membership:
- Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In Now
"emergency" - Google News
August 02, 2020 at 09:00PM
https://ift.tt/3gpyPKU
COVID-19 Emergency Bond Act Should Be Held Constitutional | New Jersey Law Journal - Law.com
"emergency" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2VVGGYQ
https://ift.tt/3d7MC6X
emergency
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "COVID-19 Emergency Bond Act Should Be Held Constitutional | New Jersey Law Journal - Law.com"
Post a Comment